Since the tragic events of September 11, 2001 there have been hundreds of thousands of people which includes hundreds of Architects and Engineers who believe that we have been fooled by what the authorities say really happened on that tragic day.
Sadly, most people refuse to even look at the evidence, which is understandable because none of us would like to know that we have been fooled, especially by the people we trust, such as our leaders.
This is a very serious subject especially since the attack on 9/11 triggered the start of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan where almost 1 million people have lost their lives. Thousands of US and NATO soldiers have died in those wars and many thousands more were injured both physically and mentally. The war on terror also added trillions to the American national debt and brought us
The Patriot Act and The National Defense Authorization Act .
With all of that being said, let’s look at some of the reasons why so many people believe that the official 9/11 story could not be true. We will also examine some of the evidence which supports the official story. You will probably find yourself believing certain parts of the official story while not believing others.
Here is a video where RT flat outs calls 911 an inside job. Have a look at the evidence they provide in the video. Lots of compelling evidence in the video including the fact that the government had many meetings with Al Queda before 2001.
Here is an interview with Dr Niels Harrit who is a Danish Professor of chemistry and nano-science, and a famous 9/11 truth researcher who has been giving lectures in many different countries.
If you do not have time to watch the video I will summarize his main points as to why he believes the official 9/11 story cannot be true.
Here are the main reasons why Dr Harrit and thousands of other Architects and Engineers do not believe the official 9/11 story.
1. Two Planes Caused 3 Skyscrapers To Fall
Most people do not know this as it has not been reported much on the main stream media but there was a third building that fell on Sept. 11 called building 7. The official reason given for the collapse of building 7 is that it was due to fire. The problem as Dr Niels pointed out is that if you look at the video of building 7 falling you will see that it collapsed perfectly into it’s own footprint which is impossible to do without explosives.
Fire, even from jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel and cause such a perfect collapse of a steel building such as building 7.
The offices in building 7 were occupied by the CIA who had their secret New York undercover headquarters, The IRS, The Pentagon where all the files were held from the investigation of the $2.3 trillion Donald Rumsfeld said went missing 2 days before 9/11, The SEC who had files in their offices of over 4000 cases of fraud being investigated by them and the Secret Service.
All of the secret files in those offices were destroyed during the collapse of building 7.
Here is the video where you will see how building 7 collapsed and how it looks like explosives were used.
With regards to the Twin Towers, there were no official reason given in the 14000 page report as to why the towers collapsed.
2. The Tiny Hole in The Pentagon
9/11 Truthers claim that the hole in the Pentagon was only 16ft wide and that the nose of the plane is made of soft materials and that there is no way it could penetrate so far into a strong reinforced building such as the Pentagon.
The Pentagon is fitted with super expensive security and surveillance systems but yet there is no video footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon.
The wreckage of the plane was also gone and believed to be shipped overseas which conveniently got rid of all the evidence.
Here is an excerpt from an article on Popular Mechanics where they attempt to debunk the Pentagon Conspiracy theory.
Claim: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building’s exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon’s middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. “How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?” asks reopen911.org, a Web site “dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001.”
The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile—part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. “This attack,” he writes, “could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel.”
Hole Truth: Flight 77’s landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon’s Ring C. (Photograph by Department of Defense)FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon’s exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.
Why wasn’t the hole as wide as a 757’s 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn’t punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon’s load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. “If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building,” Sozen tells PM, “it didn’t happen.”
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide—not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet’s landing gear, not by the fuselage.
3. Who was Osama Bin Laden?
The following is from the 911 truth website.
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department”s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dialysis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the “base” (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the “Bin Ladin Airlift” during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.
4. Mysterious Deaths of Potential Whistle Blowers
The following came from Beforeitsnews.com
Let’s now cover Deborah Palfrey, who had information exposing government officials through her escort service, Pamela Martin and Associates, she also claimed to have information about 9/11 being a government staged attack. She was in deep with the feds and planned to expose them in court. She feared she was going to be “suicided” by the government like many other 9/11 victims that had information were.
Suicided basically means that the victim is killed and the crime scene is staged to look like a suicide. In an interview on the Alex Jones show in July 2007, Palfrey explicitly stated, “I’m not planning to commit suicide” and made clear her intentions to present her case at trial, saying, “I plan on exposing the government in ways that I do not think they want me to expose them”. On May 1, 2008, Palfrey was found hanging in a storage shed outside her mother’s mobile home in Tarpon Springs, Florida.
Deborah was killed by the government so they could keep the truth a secret. This story was the last straw and was when I personally concluded 100% that 9/11 was an inside job. Deborah is not the only case in which she has been killed to cover up the world trade center attacks.
A man named Barry Jennings was also found dead because of his knowledge about the truth of 9/11. The significance of the Barry Jennings mystery is that his personal story as recounted on video leads to the conclusion that the destruction of the towers on 9/11 was planned.
On August 19, 2008, 53 year old Barry Jennings died, two days before the release of the NIST (again the organization that investigated the attacks of 9/11) Final Report on the collapse of world trade center seven (the building that was not hit by anything and just happened to collapse).
Jennings was Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority. On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions before the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the world trade center seven command centers with NYC corporation counsel Michael Hess. No cause of death has been made public, and the mainstream press has not even covered the death of this American hero.
So what do you think, do you believe the official story or do you think there is something fishy going on? Let us know in the comments below.